If you watch the news, chances are you’ve seen more than a few convicted defendants continue to insist that they’re not guilty, long after sentencing and going off to jail. Many people wonder why they deny that they’re guilty even after a trial verdict in Lubbock, TX.
Famous convicted people like Scott Peterson, of the 2002 Laci Peterson murder, continue to proclaim their innocence even when it seems like all the evidence points to the contrary—and a jury agreed. There are two broad reasons why this might happen, even if you think it’s obvious that they committed the crime of which they were accused.
They didn’t actually commit the crime
Sometimes the simplest answer is the correct one: the person who still insists they’re innocent didn’t actually commit the crime. There are plenty of people convicted of crimes that they didn’t commit, only to be proven not guilty later. For example, sometimes modern science and technology are better than what was available at the time of conviction. Today, DNA evidence abounds, but crimes from decades ago might not have had that benefit.
You might be familiar with the Golden State Killer, who was recently convicted for multiple murders in the 1970s thanks to a relative’s DNA sample. (It was obtained through a popular genetic testing website.) In that case, the defendant was guilty—but it’s a great example of how science today affords us better evidence.
There is plenty of well-documented evidence that people are wrongly convicted for a number of other reasons, too. The Innocence Project, an advocacy group that helps exonerate the wrongfully convicted, teaches that false confessions, bad eyewitness testimony and other problematic evidence lead to people being imprisoned and even executed for crimes they didn’t commit. It is entirely plausible that the person proclaiming their innocence actually is, and there are multiple cases to back that up.
It’s not a good idea to admit guilt
The other reason that someone might not admit that they committed a crime is because it doesn’t benefit them to do so. Whether they’re holding out for a lighter sentence, an appeal or a tell-all book deal, admitting guilt after the fact is simply not a smart idea. (Plus, they would give their attorneys conniptions.)
Of course, shame, humiliation and ostracism from their families may also fall under that umbrella. Some criminals are actual sociopaths, but a greater number simply don’t want to admit fault for whatever reason. As long as they proclaim their innocence, there’s a chance that people will believe them.
If you know someone denying being proven guilty in Lubbock, TX, there’s a not-small chance that they’re telling the truth. If you believe they’ve been wrongfully convicted, you may want to engage an appeals attorney on their behalf.
When you need to fight the law for your own freedom, working with a reputable and skilled attorney is the best chance at achieving a fair verdict. Call the Law Office of Rob Biggers today to discuss your options.
**This Blog/Website is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog/website you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Website publisher. The Blog/Website should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.**
Categorised in: Criminal Law